With new technology proliferating and business traveller needs and expectations evolving, travel managers are struggling to manage complex, multi-layered travel programmes. According to new research from the Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE), underwritten by HRS, travel managers recognize this challenge and understand that simplifying their programmes could yield benefits—but simplification initiatives face competing priorities.

The new study, Simplifying Managed Travel, finds that traveller safety trumps the agenda: Most buyers (94 per cent) say duty of care is a key priority; 82 per cent say it is their top priority. With 72 per cent rating it is a key priority for their managed travel program, simplification follows behind cost reduction (88 per cent), data security (84 per cent) and improving traveller satisfaction (75 per cent).

However, travel managers recognize that simplification initiatives can support their other strategic priorities. For example, 47 per cent of travel managers say that simplification will improve duty of care, and 39 per cent believe it will reduce the overall cost of their travel policy.

Travel Managers Struggle to Translate Priority into Action

Despite recognizing the importance of simplification, travel managers see a gap between intention and execution. Reflecting the strategic importance placed on traveller safety, duty of care is the travel buyer’s top priority for simplification: A majority (83 per cent) say duty of care requires immediate action (62 per cent).  Data security appears second on buyers’ list of simplification targets.

Disconnects between buyers’ simplification priorities and their actual behaviour, however, indicate barriers to pursuing strategic goals. The execution gaps for duty of care and data security are large relative to other priorities, with more than one-in-five buyers saying they are not currently translating their traveller safety (23 per cent) and data security (24 per cent) concerns into action.

Suppliers and Internal Stakeholders Must Become Partners in Simplification

Today’s complex travel programmes encompass multiple partners and stakeholders—internally and externally. To be effective, simplification initiatives often require support from these parties. While nearly one-in-five buyers do not get support from peers in other departments, most report that internal stakeholders are on board with simplification initiatives:

• Procurement is most often regarded as a partner in simplification (57 per cent);
• Internal risk/security and communications staff follow (40 per cent);
• IT support (36 per cent) and human resources (28 per cent) lag other departments.

Third parties can supply relevant tools and expertise, providing support to travel buyers’ simplification initiatives. Buyers welcome this assistance: More than half of buyers not currently receiving help from travel providers say they want it. Internally and externally, the data suggests that the travel buyers who say simplification is a top strategic priority are better at collaborating to reach their simplification goals.

“The value travel management provides to a company is increasingly measured in optimised processes and cross-department collaboration,” explained HRS CEO Tobias Ragge. “The study shows this close collaboration is vital and that leading companies build on their internal stakeholder network, but they also rely on the data, advice and support of external partners to reach their strategic goals.”

Driving Effective Simplification

Simplification is a key route for travel managers to achieve their business objectives. However, facing the hurdles of limited resources and differing levels of support from internal and external stakeholders, buyers must ramp up communication with suppliers, other departments within the organization and with the travellers themselves.

The study can be downloaded https://corporate.hrs.com/int/simplify.

With new technology proliferating and business traveller needs and expectations evolving, travel managers are struggling to manage complex, multi-layered travel programmes. According to new research from the Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE), underwritten by HRS, travel managers recognize this challenge and understand that simplifying their programmes could yield benefits—but simplification initiatives face competing priorities.

The new study, Simplifying Managed Travel, finds that traveller safety trumps the agenda: Most buyers (94 per cent) say duty of care is a key priority; 82 per cent say it is their top priority. With 72 per cent rating it a key priority for their managed travel program, simplification follows behind cost reduction (88 per cent), data security (84 per cent) and improving traveller satisfaction (75 per cent).

However, travel managers recognize that simplification initiatives can support their other strategic priorities. For example, 47 per cent of travel managers say that simplification will improve duty of care, and 39 per cent believe it will reduce the overall cost of their travel policy.

Travel Managers Struggle to Translate Priority into Action

Despite recognizing the importance of simplification, travel managers see a gap between intention and execution. Reflecting the strategic importance placed on traveller safety, duty of care is the travel buyer’s top priority for simplification: A majority (83 per cent) say duty of care requires immediate action (62 per cent).  Data security appears second on buyers’ list of simplification targets.

Disconnects between buyers’ simplification priorities and their actual behaviour, however, indicate barriers to pursuing strategic goals. The execution gaps for duty of care and data security are large relative to other priorities, with more than one-in-five buyers saying they are not currently translating their traveller safety (23 per cent) and data security (24 per cent) concerns into action.

Suppliers and Internal Stakeholders Must Become Partners in Simplification

Today’s complex travel programmes encompass multiple partners and stakeholders—internally and externally. To be effective, simplification initiatives often require support from these parties. While nearly one-in-five buyers do not get support from peers in other departments, most report that internal stakeholders are on board with simplification initiatives:

• Procurement is most often regarded as a partner in simplification (57 per cent);
• Internal risk/security and communications staff follow (40 per cent);
• IT support (36 per cent) and human resources (28 per cent) lag other departments.

Third parties can supply relevant tools and expertise, providing support to travel buyers’ simplification initiatives. Buyers welcome this assistance: More than half of buyers not currently receiving help from travel providers say they want it. Internally and externally, the data suggests that the travel buyers who say simplification is a top strategic priority are better at collaborating to reach their simplification goals.

“The value travel management provides to a company is increasingly measured in optimised processes and cross-department collaboration,” explained HRS CEO Tobias Ragge. “The study shows this close collaboration is vital and that leading companies build on their internal stakeholder network, but they also rely on the data, advice and support of external partners to reach their strategic goals.”

Driving Effective Simplification

Simplification is a key route for travel managers to achieve their business objectives. However, facing the hurdles of limited resources and differing levels of support from internal and external stakeholders, buyers must ramp up communication with suppliers, other departments within the organization and with the travellers themselves.

The study can be downloaded https://corporate.hrs.com/int/simplify.